Oh, sure, Debord had his context and was experimenting. However if you consider that philosophy is a useful field, full of serious questions that one ought to

Oh, sure, Debord had his context and was experimenting. However if you consider that philosophy is a useful field, full of serious questions that one ought to seriously try to answer, I think you have to dismiss the Lettrist movement as unhelpful at best, as a failed experience or a dead end of modern philosophy, if you are as disappointed in it as I am. They may be an interesting literature movement, but they are as helpful to philosophy as would be people who would proclaim that all quantum theory makes more sense when expressed in Sumerian.