3 ms·

Those aren't scare quotes, they're just regular quotes. Here I assume they're taken from the police statement on the incident. Edit to add quote in context: >

by davefp 7y ago

Those aren't scare quotes, they're just regular quotes. Here I assume they're taken from the police statement on the incident. Edit to add quote in context: > West Yorkshire Fire and Rescue Service said the cause of the "dramatic" incident was "excessive" air freshener use.

justin66 7y ago
No, they're scare quotes. Quoting the police statement would involve... quoting the police statement (or a portion of it, or multiple portions joined by elipsis), not quoting two separate words from the police statement. Regarding your edit: yes, they use scare quotes in the article text as well as the headline. It's stupid.
- xxpor 7y ago
  That's standard British style. Look at every BBC headline, they almost always have at least one thing in quotes.
  - justin66 7y ago
    Thanks, I'll keep an eye out for that. To be honest the BBC is probably the only British thing I read much. Am I right in assuming it's generally a bit less tabloidish than a lot of the other popular stuff?
    - robjan 7y ago
      BBC isn't a tabloid but it's also not particularly high quality either, especially the output of the BBC Worldwide service (BBC.com) which has different editorial guidelines.
    - pfortuny 7y ago
      Yes you are right. It is one of the few news source still trying to be as independent as possible. This despite being paid for by the Government.
- happytoexplain 7y ago
  I disagree. The feeling that immediately hits me when I read this headline is that they are pulling terminology from a 3rd party and using quotes to in fact lessen the scare-factor of the terminology. To me, this headline says, "here's how this incident is officially described, not just some stuff we're making up to be dramatic - please read the article to get the details, because the terminology is not necessarily objective." This feels responsible to me, rather than fear-mongering. I think your approach may be a little tainted by the common cynical outlook many people share regarding the entirety of the concept of news.
  - justin66 7y ago
    > I think your approach may be a little tainted by the common cynical outlook many people share regarding the entirety of the concept of news. Regarding my outlook towards the news, nothing could be further from the truth. > To me, this headline says, "here's how this incident is officially described, not just some stuff we're making up to be dramatic - please read the article to get the details, because the terminology is not necessarily objective." That's part of the problem with scare quotes. You're not trusting the reader. (in this case, the reader should be trusted to know that "blows up" and "excessive" are, well, as I described them above. One would hope they also trust you to not make stuff up, but if not, you're not going to fix that with some quotes.)
  - dTal 7y ago
    The term "scare quotes" is not synonymous with "scary quotes" - it refers to quotation marks added in order to distance the author from the source of the words, exactly as you describe.

by davefp 7y ago

justin66 7y ago

No, they're scare quotes. Quoting the police statement would involve... quoting the police statement (or a portion of it, or multiple portions joined by elipsis), not quoting two separate words from the police statement. Regarding your edit: yes, they use scare quotes in the article text as well as the headline. It's stupid.

xxpor 7y ago
That's standard British style. Look at every BBC headline, they almost always have at least one thing in quotes.
- justin66 7y ago
  Thanks, I'll keep an eye out for that. To be honest the BBC is probably the only British thing I read much. Am I right in assuming it's generally a bit less tabloidish than a lot of the other popular stuff?
  - robjan 7y ago
    BBC isn't a tabloid but it's also not particularly high quality either, especially the output of the BBC Worldwide service (BBC.com) which has different editorial guidelines.
  - pfortuny 7y ago
    Yes you are right. It is one of the few news source still trying to be as independent as possible. This despite being paid for by the Government.
happytoexplain 7y ago
I disagree. The feeling that immediately hits me when I read this headline is that they are pulling terminology from a 3rd party and using quotes to in fact lessen the scare-factor of the terminology. To me, this headline says, "here's how this incident is officially described, not just some stuff we're making up to be dramatic - please read the article to get the details, because the terminology is not necessarily objective." This feels responsible to me, rather than fear-mongering. I think your approach may be a little tainted by the common cynical outlook many people share regarding the entirety of the concept of news.
- justin66 7y ago
  > I think your approach may be a little tainted by the common cynical outlook many people share regarding the entirety of the concept of news. Regarding my outlook towards the news, nothing could be further from the truth. > To me, this headline says, "here's how this incident is officially described, not just some stuff we're making up to be dramatic - please read the article to get the details, because the terminology is not necessarily objective." That's part of the problem with scare quotes. You're not trusting the reader. (in this case, the reader should be trusted to know that "blows up" and "excessive" are, well, as I described them above. One would hope they also trust you to not make stuff up, but if not, you're not going to fix that with some quotes.)
- dTal 7y ago
  The term "scare quotes" is not synonymous with "scary quotes" - it refers to quotation marks added in order to distance the author from the source of the words, exactly as you describe.