4 ms·

The second option seems more likely. The more concerning thing is how Google is starting to use its power when it isn't happy with something. Google doesn't e

• exikyut 7y ago
  Hmm. The good thing is that this suggests they've apparently hit the complacency plateau that everybody large seems to hit that marks their modus-operandi as "set in stone". The sad thing is that they're the only company with (presumably - but if you think about it...) multiple exabytes of RAM to hold a greppable copy of the Internet in, so nobody's realistically going to beat them at the game anytime soon D: Also, I was going to say but forgot (was on mobile) - this was an anticompetitivity investigation, and that was why I said their attitude of "yes we are indeed 'it'" was so concerning. Kind of like, "whatcha gonna do about it, huh?"
  • Razengan 7y ago
    Google Search is far, far, far, FAR from a "greppable copy of the Internet in" and it keeps getting worse. It certainly doesn't seem to be difficult to imagine someone coming up with a better search engine.
    • exikyut 7y ago
      Heh, I sure would love to know exactly how big the index actually is. And how much of it is never (or practically never) accessed. And what the distribution graph looks like. It sure would be fun to come up with a better engine, but where do I get the RAM to run it in? :< (ie: how do I _ethically_ pay for it? hahaha)
  • exikyut 7y ago
    [Hm: this is currently at -1]