> I think most serious news companies think they have an important democratic mission. But at the end of the day, the economics have to make sense in order for

> I think most serious news companies think they have an important democratic mission. But at the end of the day, the economics have to make sense in order for quality journalism to exist in the first place. I guess the real question that we have to answer as a society is: what's more important: democracy or an unfettered free market economy. If the answer is democracy, the economics of our society can be changed to make it work for journalism. Maybe those changes will mean some Chicago-school economist's equation won't yield the highest value for some term, but that's perfectly fine. Despite some popular misconceptions, modern economic theories do not communicate the true, revealed nature of human society. The economy needs to serve society, not the other way around.