> it's "prosumer" equipment, not "professional" in the sense that SGI and similar were Does the average consumer purchase a Mac Pro? No. Is the Mac Pro being u

> it's "prosumer" equipment, not "professional" in the sense that SGI and similar were Does the average consumer purchase a Mac Pro? No. Is the Mac Pro being used in every professional setting previously dominated by SGI? Yes. > The Mac Pro isn't different enough to categorize it along the lines of SGI. Uniqueness of architecture is orthogonal to the argument - which is that the cost of handling professional-grade workloads on the desktop is lower than ever.