Article is half sentiment. Yes the technology is premature when it comes to Methodology with approximate results but what the article also serves is a form of b

Article is half sentiment. Yes the technology is premature when it comes to Methodology with approximate results but what the article also serves is a form of bioconservatism by way of cautionary bureacracy mentioned towards the end. Its a lesson that transhuman modification still has a ways to go and that finess and experimental design needs to be consistent without jumping the gun. Until you can master it with flat worms, maybe don't jump to animals or self experiments.