3 ms·
> Asmongold made a good move. No, the actual good move would have been for him to pay someone, or a company, a percentage of the revenue to make high quality v
by stale2002 7y ago
> Asmongold made a good move.
No, the actual good move would have been for him to pay someone, or a company, a percentage of the revenue to make high quality videos for him, at the very begining.
The fact that he didn't do this, in the first place, means that he left hundreds of thousands of dollars on the table, which he could have captured if he had put a bit of effort into paying someone to make his youtube channel in the first place.
Monetizing isn't the "fun" part of streaming though.
- meerita 7y agoYou're assuming that move would give him more money. And he can do that anytime. But how do you know people will love to see his stream highlights without expending all that money, well, you let your community do that.
- stale2002 7y ago> without expending all that money You are assuming that this is some large amount of money for a streamer. It is not. It is possible to outsource your entire YouTube presence to a company, that will merely take a cut of the profits. So there would be no risk, if you give a company a percentage of the revenue.