4 ms·
I think it's a generally frugal market even if some of us are flush with a bit of cash. There's a lot you can get done for free with various FOSS stacks, and ou
by aseipp 7y ago
I think it's a generally frugal market even if some of us are flush with a bit of cash. There's a lot you can get done for free with various FOSS stacks, and outside of highly specialized tools that aren't easy to replicate in features/availability/guarantees, I think it's a hard market to get a foot in, because the power of NIH is so strong. Things like IDEs, or security services, that take either a very slow burn or a lot of programming/design power are possibly the exception, and even then you can spoil it. A lot of people on here got upset when JetBrains moved from permanent licenses to a subscription service -- but in hindsight, I think it was the right move and it probably paid off! Think about that: you have a tool that is used in-and-out, like bread and butter, every day, like 30 hours a week -- and maybe, if you're lucky, a developer who makes 6 figures will say "ok I'll pay $200 a year i guess" or whatever. It's kind of incredible! Of course corporate accounts do not bat an eye at this; in fact they like continuous support, renewals, and services. It keeps things regular.
It's very easy to look at JetBrains and say it can obviously work, just the same way people look at RedHat (or other outliers) and say it can work. They're a standout company in this space, and have high reputation, and it didn't come from nowhere. They almost make it look easy -- just sell a great product, boom! But it depends on a lot of factors like when they entered the market, how they grew over time, etc. It's possible they wouldn't be able to get off the ground today if they tried this whole thing again.
In fact I wouldn't be surprised if JetBrains existence, happening before the whole VC craze, has in fact influenced the market itself, today: even with millions of dollars of VC funny money, it would probably be very difficult to compete with them on their turf in 2019, when they have extremely high reputation and a big array of products, in a market that is a very "small world". They're the 900lb gorilla in the room, in a sense, but they did it on their own.
JetBrains products are amazing though, without a doubt, and they deserve their success. I wish them all the best.
- toyg 7y ago> It's possible they wouldn't be able to get off the ground today if they tried this whole thing again. I think that's unkind. The product they had when they started (IDEA) was so much better than the competition, that it felt like magic. Yes, they rode the Java wave, but there have been other waves since then (Ruby, Python...) and nobody really managed to replicate for those markets the same experience of productivity jump that JetBrains managed back then. Meanwhile, JetBrains have done it again with PyCharm, which is the Python IDE and has been consistently ahead of the competition literally from day 1. They entered a market where others had been for more than a decade, and ran away with it. That's just skill, not timing. By the time Python exploded in popularity, they were the obvious choice already. The fact that they can even field competitive products in the Microsoft space, where the gold-standard of IDEs has existed for 25+ years, is testament to their talent. They've also legitimized a subscription-based approach to software-development tools, which will make it much easier for anyone to compete with them. A "new JetBrains" would find it much easier to develop an IDE today and get paid for it, which wasn't the case 20 years ago. The problem is really that very few people seem to think they can deliver a jump in developer productivity of the sort we've seen with IDEA back then.