As I read the article which hit a lot of my favorite stretches of measure and the assumptions underlying inference I couldn't help but notice the only instance

As I read the article which hit a lot of my favorite stretches of measure and the assumptions underlying inference I couldn't help but notice the only instance of "trans" is transcendence in a footnote. One can't help but wonder how do you factor the generational recursion these traits have. We know how much some of these are due to our environmental exposure, and how we are socially trained. Transgender people are in the crux of this colossal attempt to define personality by measure, and yet I literally do not see us mentioned even once. I'd like to know where a set of my cohort follow in this D measure from their assigned gender to their expression. Are nonbinaries truly in the middle? What does this distance look like in settings where traits are conditionally measured? E.G. how do highly empathetic men compare to highly empathetic women? These questions are salient to me because I am in the early stages of transition myself and I find articles like this always lacking key details to sate my curiosity.