5 ms·
Jennifer Robertson said her late husband's death "should not be in doubt", adding it is unclear how its confirmation "would assist the asset recovery process fu
by 14 7y ago
Jennifer Robertson said her late husband's death "should not be in doubt", adding it is unclear how its confirmation "would assist the asset recovery process further".
It would not help in the recovery process but it could certainly calm angry mobs of people who lost their fortunes. If he truly did die at least a for myself I could live with that and just count it as a freak unfortunate loss of life and funds with no malicious wrong doing. If it proves he faked his death then we need to keep looking for this guy. People deserve answers as to why they can no longer access their money and I do not blame them for wanting an actual authority, the RCMP, to confirm this.
- curiousgal 7y agoIf he was going to fake his own death why whould he not have his "body" cremated?
- Danieru 7y agoIf we can ant to play the why game: His handling of the exit scam was already super suspicious, cremation would have just been that much more of a red flag. At least burying gives a chance to delay.
- tyingq 7y agoMy best guess is that he was going to have plastic surgery in Jaipur. There are several plastic surgeons right near the Fortis hospital. Maybe to alter his appearance. And then the surgery went badly.
- dbuder 7y agoRead the articles, he had a medical condition, that is the stated reason for being in Jaipur.
- NedIsakoff 7y agoOr he had the fake death certificate and bought a fake body in Jaipur. Then did plastic surgery and scooted out of there.
- chejazi 7y ago> with no malicious wrong doing There is clear evidence of malfeasance, regardless of whether he died or not (sending "Quadriga" assets to other exchanges, etc).
- Waterluvian 7y agoIs there any actual evidence justifying digging him up or are we squinting really hard to make it look acceptable to dig him up just because a group of scam victims are upset? I sure hope the bar is high for deciding to dig up someone's loved one and dragging them through indescribable further pain just to satisfy a mouth-frothing crypto crowd. The good news is that the legal system sits in the way so we do have a judge who will weigh the options.
- mobilefriendly 7y agoYes, he moved assets around and clearly did not operate the exchange lawfully. His wife could very well be a co-conspirator. It is also possible he's the victim of a homicide.
- deleted 7y ago[deleted]
- josu 7y agoThe problem seems to be the lack of evidence about his death.
- Waterluvian 7y agoWasn't there a death certificate? The problem I have is that I smell mob mentality of being perfectly okay to impinge upon rights because their own mental model of justice allows it.
- tyingq 7y agoThere was a death certificate, but it was from Jaipur, where corruption and bribery are apparently fairly common. I don't have any dog in this fight, but the story is pretty interesting. The certificate: https://www.coindesk.com/indian-death-certificate-crypto-exchange-quadrigacx-death https://www.coindesk.com/indian-death-certificate-crypto-exc...
- blattimwind 7y ago