so, thinking fast and slow has received a fair amount of criticism, both here on HN and elsewhere. Some previous threads & links that may be of interest (and pe

so, thinking fast and slow has received a fair amount of criticism, both here on HN and elsewhere. Some previous threads & links that may be of interest (and perhaps value!) to you. Start with this: [0] https://retractionwatch.com/2017/02/20/placed-much-faith-underpowered-studies-nobel-prize-winner-admits-mistakes/ https://retractionwatch.com/2017/02/20/placed-much-faith-und... [1] https://www.wenglinskyreview.com/wenglinsky-review-a-journal-of-culture-politics/2017/1/23/kahnemans-fallacies https://www.wenglinskyreview.com/wenglinsky-review-a-journal... [2] https://www.reddit.com/r/slatestarcodex/comments/8lnlmt/is_thinking_fast_and_slow_by_daniel_kahneman/ https://www.reddit.com/r/slatestarcodex/comments/8lnlmt/is_t... [3] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=12030791 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=12030791 Just to be clear, I think its a great book; but there are, apparently, as for all things human, limitations & errors here and there. :)