3 ms·
Here's how you solve this problem. I do this on my own projects and with Chart.js which we resurrected from the brink of a "2.0 is coming... please wait" cliff.
by fulldecent2 7y ago
Here's how you solve this problem. I do this on my own projects and with Chart.js which we resurrected from the brink of a "2.0 is coming... please wait" cliff.
1. Add a project scope to the README -- this gives you and volunteers grounds to close issues that are not relevant.
2. Send a personal email to your 3 top contributors -- ask if you can give them push access (even if they aren't recent contributors) at a minimum as an insurance policy.
3. Automate or at least specify your release process. You should be able to do this reliably, while drunk and high, and when you have 17 other projects needing your attention. Example: https://github.com/fulldecent/FDWaveformView/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#release-process https://github.com/fulldecent/FDWaveformView/blob/master/CON...
I have been involved in a few "takeovers" to implement the above and keep great projects running. A little structure and human goes a long way. You don't need to fork and be the new dictator to keep something great moving.