Which leads to two linked questions: - Is it a valid criticism? - If so, are the social sciences really sciences at all? And one philosophical question: - W

Which leads to two linked questions: - Is it a valid criticism? - If so, are the social sciences really sciences at all? And one philosophical question: - What happens if an entire field of "research" is dissolved as wholly subjective and not repeatable? This would be much bigger than the debunking of phrenology or astrology as those don't have university departments, journals, or attempt to set social policy.