3 ms·
Are you saying we can't be reasonably sure there weren't actually "part-human, part-animal hunters" at that place and time, or am I missing your point?
by kaffeemitsahne 7y ago
Are you saying we can't be reasonably sure there weren't actually "part-human, part-animal hunters" at that place and time, or am I missing your point?
- mc32 7y agoMaybe it wasn’t figurative. Maybe people wore parts of animals in some circumstances (for a hunt “for magical power”, whatever) and that’s whats in the paintings rather than a centaur type thing, although we don’t know and it could be a centaur type thing.