Well, I'm pretty happy to discount theology for example. My knowledge of the subject is rather small, but big enough that I'm aware that it is a very rich disci

Well, I'm pretty happy to discount theology for example. My knowledge of the subject is rather small, but big enough that I'm aware that it is a very rich discipline of knowledge. As atheist/agnostic I just don't see any use for it. I'm reading "Wittgenstein’s Aesthetics" from Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy [0] and ... At least this summary doesn't peak my interest. Granted, I seem to have different opinions to Wittgenstein, but that's not the issue. The issue is that the arguments presented are, dare I say it, not aesthetically pleasing :) . > Wittgenstein, Nietzsche and countless others would agree. Again, proof from authority + social proof. I don't care how big their names are, or how many people believe it. So, I will end here. [0] https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/wittgenstein-aesthetics/ https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/wittgenstein-aesthetics/