4 ms·
Your assertion is true but you missed the point. Completely. Let me clarify - the process by which commenters gleefully (damn that’s a nice word) add things to
by ronilan 7y ago
Your assertion is true but you missed the point. Completely.
Let me clarify - the process by which commenters gleefully (damn that’s a nice word) add things to the list is illustrative of how things got added to the interview process. No one ever said something (or anything) should be done before interview.
Now as for “tackling before you die”.
If your name is Bobby Wagner, than by all means, tackle, it’s your job, but please do not die.
If you are programmer, you are not obliged to neither.
- esotericn 7y agoThe blog post is offering interesting things to do as a hobby. An interview process is completely different. An interviewer who loads up a process with nonsense is a prat, and is actively decreasing the quality of their hires.
- ronilan 7y agoDaniel, system doesn’t let me comment below - so I’ll comment inline cause it actually matters: ”An interviewer who loads up a process with nonsense is a prat” It’s not one person - it’s the entire industry. All of us. Clearer?
- esotericn 7y agoHello! I strongly disagree. I've been through good and bad interview processes. From my perspective, the bad processes are a good signal for companies I wouldn't enjoy working at. By the way, you can reply by clicking the 'N minutes ago' link to open the thread.
- ronilan 7y agoBy the way, you can reply by clicking the 'N minutes ago' link to open the thread. Thanks. Didn’t know that. I was under the impression the “reply” link is removed when levels get deeper as part of an “anti flame” system. @dang?
- detaro 7y agoYes, that's what's happening. Apparently hiding the reply link and forcing you to go through a different route is considered to be a compromise that hopefully stops people a bit/causes them to take note without stopping the conversation entirely.
- ronilan 7y agoEvery interaction is a learning opportunity. :)