4 ms·
>It's a weird thing to somehow think that an AI with only 4 days of training data should somehow outperform even a human child, which has a decade or more of im
by allovernow 7y ago
>It's a weird thing to somehow think that an AI with only 4 days of training data should somehow outperform even a human child, which has a decade or more of imitation learning experience.
Well...not so much if you consider that machines are orders of magnitude faster than humans in any other task, including processing and recording data, a.k.a. learning.
- TheRealPomax 7y agoNot really, no. Procesing and recording data is not "learning". Machines are incredibly much faster at _classifying_ but that's been our problem for decades now: we figured out how to make insanely efficient and unreasonably good classifiers. However, we haven't been really able to turn that into efficient "learning", the best we've been able to do is what Deep Mind does, which requires very power machines working with literally decades worth of data.