5 ms·
No one would want to create content. So in a backwards way, we want content, so it's our will to have copyright law. If you can suggest another way we can have
by coding123 7y ago
No one would want to create content. So in a backwards way, we want content, so it's our will to have copyright law. If you can suggest another way we can have shows like Dexter I think you should speak up.
- esotericn 7y agoI think that the society with no copyright law is better, so I'd give up Dexter for it. It's erroneous to just picture the same world with paid media missing and nothing else sprouting up.
- clarry 7y agoIndeed, and I think that those who want Dexter should figure something out between themselves and whoever can produce Dexter for them, instead of imposing laws that affect everyone in the country or world (including those who want to have nothing to do with Dexter). I'm sure if enough people want Dexter and are willing to pay for it, they'll get it, even without copyright law.
- asciident 7y ago> I'm sure if enough people want Dexter and are willing to pay for it, they'll get it, even without copyright law. This seems like an overly naive way of thinking, see Prisoner's Dilemma as a starting point.
- dredmorbius 7y agoGiven that 1) I have no idea what Dexter is and 2) copyright most often stands between me and works which would have been public domain under the terms extant at the time of their authorship and publication, I'm more than willing to make this trade. Even Dexter fans may submit that it's not the author + 70 years or 90 year corporate copyright term that is essential for its creation, but rather the revenues made possible through exclusive rights to advertising and subscriptions in the first few years of release.
- coding123 7y agoHow about Star Wars?