4 ms·
This was like the archetype of a partisan argument. You two managed to go through why the sides don't like each other's worldview or the way it's expressed, a
by faceplanted 7y ago
This was like the archetype of a partisan argument.
You two managed to go through why the sides don't like each other's worldview or the way it's expressed, and then stopped the second it came to discussing any real world issues. And I mean both of you as well, you could've given examples and data about why your system might be in anyone's interest but you didn't and it would've been the perfect time for him to reply with examples and data in favour of his, and neither of you even tried, it just stopped.
It's fucking amazing.
- deleted 7y ago[deleted]
- skrebbel 7y ago> You two Who two? Every next comment was written by a different person.
- faceplanted 7y agoI was mistaken.
- analog31 7y agoJust for the sake of disclosure, I'm as partisan as they come, but... Partisan arguments tend to go poorly on nice civil web forums, and I'd expect to attract the attention of the moderators if I were to start one.
- rayiner 7y agoI’m not trying to convince anybody of that world view. My point is more modest: people can reasonably disagree about what is in the “best interest” of various groups, and therefore there is a difference between “convincing people to vote against their best interest” and “convincing people that a particular world view is in their best interest.”