5 ms·
This is indeed an imaginary problem. Do we really think that people who do lower-level jobs can't be trained to do higher-level jobs? The same thing was said du
by insickness 7y ago
This is indeed an imaginary problem. Do we really think that people who do lower-level jobs can't be trained to do higher-level jobs? The same thing was said during the industrial revolution. If we make tractors, what will happen to the people who toil in the fields by hand? Those people ended up running the machines. Now all of a sudden we are somehow sure that when the people running the machines get put out of work by higher-order computing, those people won't be able to adapt? Not buying it. The human mind has a lot of plasticity. It learns to grow and change based on its environment. IQ has gone up in developed countries.
We are clamoring for a problem that doesn't yet exist, ready to provide a solution that won't give people what they need the most: a feeling that they are a valuable part of society. It's pure arrogance to predict that people can't learn new trades, that there are people currently functioning in society who will one day be too dumb to be part of society.
- chillacy 7y ago> Do we really think that people who do lower-level jobs can't be trained to do higher-level jobs? It's not going to be easy to retrain the 3 million truck drivers, many of whom have high school diplomas and are age 60+ men, for one of the high-growth jobs of today (topped with software engineer, statistician, nurse practitioner). Especially considering that they're competing against 20-somethings. And when I say it's not going to be easy I mean we haven't managed to do it so far. By the numbers those who have lost their auto manufacturing jobs to automation have not been retrained very well. Half dropped out of the workforce, and of those the other half filed for disability (the number of disability beneficiaries has increased 5x since 1970).