3 ms·
For the first watermark mechanism, it's described in the complaint in paragraph #60: > This watermark (“Watermark #1”) involved replacing the apostrophes in a
by function_seven 7y ago
For the first watermark mechanism, it's described in the complaint in paragraph #60:
> This watermark (“Watermark #1”) involved replacing the apostrophes in a selection of newly released songs with a distinctive pattern of curly (’) and straight apostrophes (').6 Genius set the 2nd, 5th, 13th, 14th, 16th and 20th apostrophes of each watermarked song as curly apostrophes, and all the other apostrophes straight. If the straight apostrophes are interpreted as dots and the curly apostrophes are interpreted as dashes, the pattern spells out “REDHANDED” in Morse code, as shown below. Genius designed Watermark #1 to be woven into the text of the lyrics of the watermarked songs so that, if the apostrophe pattern were to be found outside of Genius’s website, there would be no explanation other than that the lyrics were copied from Genius’s website, e.g., by using the copy/paste functionality or a computer program.
- katzgrau 7y agoAh, pretty clever. The REDHANDED phrase seems much more likely to convince a jury
- alexcnwy 7y agoThat's so clever - it's like an intellectual property honeypot. It reminds me of "trap streets" mapmakers add to their maps to "trap" potential copyright violators: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trap_street https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trap_street