3 ms·
That makes sense, but that license surely wouldn’t include independent artists that do not have a publisher. Then again, independent artists most likely do not
by taejavu 7y ago
That makes sense, but that license surely wouldn’t include independent artists that do not have a publisher. Then again, independent artists most likely do not have the means to take legal action, or at least the outcome wouldn’t justify the expense, so I suppose that point is moot.
- toast0 7y agoMusic licensing (at least in the US) often involves blanket licenses that cover all music, without requiring consent or knowledge of the rightsholder(s). There's usually a designated administrative company, such as ASCAP, that royalties are paid to in absence of more specific agreements, and they divy them up. In this arrangement, for covered uses, generally rightsholders have no claim against the company, if it followed the forms, they would need to take it up with the administrative agency.