3 ms·
The semantics aren't exactly meant to be "% of land area", but they do represent a rough coordinate system[1], from (5, 8) in the SW corner of the contiguous US
by alexhutcheson 7y ago
The semantics aren't exactly meant to be "% of land area", but they do represent a rough coordinate system[1], from (5, 8) in the SW corner of the contiguous US (San Diego) up to (95, 90) in Boston.
Interestingly, US highways follow the opposite system[2], going from (1, 2) in the NE corner of the country (Maine) to (former) (101, 80) in San Diego.
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Interstate_Highway_System#Numbering_system https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Interstate_Highway_System#Numb...
[2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Numbered_Highway_System#Numbering https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Numbered_Highway...
- lotsofpulp 7y agoNumbering from west to East and south to north and using evens and odds to mean East-west and north-south makes sense. But that doesn’t imply anything about proportion of country, however the measurement is defined.
- jimktrains2 7y agoThose us routes came first and the interstates are purposely numbered backwards of it to avoid confusion.