> What "error"? That definition comes straight from Richard Rumelt You're totally misreading. You made no error in your first post, I was agreeing with you. T

> What "error"? That definition comes straight from Richard Rumelt You're totally misreading. You made no error in your first post, I was agreeing with you. The error is people not understanding what a strategy is. A strategy is a plan of action, not merely a goal. So that no-one can possibly misunderstand I will rephrase that as "I have seen people at my work make that same error that you describe". In general, it's not good for you to respond, clearly upset but not understanding, in the heat of the moment like that. > Hard to tell if you're just trolling. Responded anyway just in case you simply rushed to make a point w/out noticing you'd entirely missed mine. That's not a nice way to respond, at all, to someone who is corroborating. Quite ironic, though.