you don't have to be circumspect about it, it's also the description google uses if you search directly for cfacu. yahoo also uses it, and it's in several busin

you don't have to be circumspect about it, it's also the description google uses if you search directly for cfacu. yahoo also uses it, and it's in several business directories, which you can see by searching on that phrase. can you actually source it from DMOZ though? if so, they should call them on it, the open license seems to require attribution. edit: I see google says they use DMOZ to populate descriptions if they don't have one: http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?hl=en&answer=35264 http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?hl=en... yeah, sorry, I don't find Bing's behavior particularly egregious, but I'm finding equating it to compliantly using open material about as compelling as the arguments that are forgetting that robots.txt exists.