4 ms·
> I guess we could do nothing and hope that at some point governments figure out to build public transportation in a reasonable time frame for a reasonable amou
by AlexandrB 7y ago
> I guess we could do nothing and hope that at some point governments figure out to build public transportation in a reasonable time frame for a reasonable amount of money...
Non-US governments already have. This isn't incompetence, it's intentional policy.
> This is because of all the other cars clogging up the road.
Ride sharing has only made this problem worse[1]. Is there any evidence that even more ride sharing will improve the situation? The basic problem is that everyone needs to get into or out of a few central locations at around the same time (typically 9am/5pm). Solving this requires moving people more efficiently (as in more people/m^2 of roadway) than cars, even ride sharing cars, would allow.
[1] https://www.smartcitiesdive.com/news/report-ride-sharing-increases-not-reduces-traffic/528659/ https://www.smartcitiesdive.com/news/report-ride-sharing-inc...
- imgabe 7y agoNobody is saying not to invest in public transportation. I'm for that 100%. I sincerely hope the US develops the political will to do it. But even if everyone agrees to do it tomorrow, we're talking decades to completely rebuild infrastructure of major cities. I don't know why this is framed as an either/or choice. Build better public transportation, sure. How about we also use cars more efficiently. Why are you against that?