4 ms·

> I don't think you're bad people, but the least y'all can do is be honest I don't like this framing (sort of implies they aren't be honest) but regardless jus

• giancarlostoro 7y ago
  Especially if they haven't even said anything yet. A better suggestion would be "It's okay if you're not working on this, but let the community know." I have a feeling some use this for production grade work.
• dedsm 7y ago
  there are a couple of issues with "moving on", since the project is owned by pypa, it feels it should be the default for python projects, pipenv has a good idea, but in my opinion, a flawed implementation, and maybe all my issues are already resolved in those 600+ commits without release. About the framing of the question, I think it's because of all the flame wars in the past when people criticized pipenv and maintainers took it a bit personal.
• gonational 7y ago
  For me, and perhaps others, there is a desire to see this project explicitly move aside (vs slowly die), so that poetry and other projects can take the reins. A lot of people say “just fork it” or “choose something else”, but the problem is that python is a finite community with a finite amount of energy, and a lot of this energy has been absorbed by the star power Kenneth acquired from his prior successes (namely, requests... which btw now has an even better replacement called httpx). It’s almost like Kent needs to come out and say “I’m sorry I screwed up, here’s my towel; good night.”, so that people can move on.