I don’t feel like this really makes for a sound argument. It reads like an appeal to personal responsibility. A dog doesn’t have, say, an implied level of safet

I don’t feel like this really makes for a sound argument. It reads like an appeal to personal responsibility. A dog doesn’t have, say, an implied level of safety from a manufacturer as something that doesn’t kill people. I don’t think the dog analogy holds well enough. I don’t want personal responsibility. I want to not get killed by an autonomous vehicle, period, and I say hold the party responsible whose responsibility more likely prevents my death. For me, that leans toward the manufacturer. If that bankrupts manufacturers because their devices kill people, fantastic, that just opens the market wide for autonomous vehicles that don’t kill people.