2 ms·
He said there is a potential for violation if DOT and the public were misled by "engineering-quality work"- even if the authors did not claim to be engineers.
by sili 16y ago
He said there is a potential for violation if DOT and the public were misled by "engineering-quality work"- even if the authors did not claim to be engineers.
I might be too literal here, but if you did not intend to mislead anyone, why should you be responsible for how "the public" interprets your work.
- sofuture 16y agoExactly. I can't even begin to see how making a case to a third party deciding authority instantly thrusts you into taking full responsibility for public safety. What an absurd concept.