Most of my thoughts have already been echoed elsewhere in this thread, but: > "To me, what the experiment proved was that clicks on Google are being incorporat

Most of my thoughts have already been echoed elsewhere in this thread, but: > "To me, what the experiment proved was that clicks on Google are being incorporated in Bing’s rankings." It proved that clicks on other websites are being incorporated in Bing's rankings, which had already been public knowledge, I think. It didn't prove that only or disproportionately clicks on Google are being thus incorporated, although that is what Google is repeatedly claiming. > "If clicks on Google really account for only 1/1000th (or some other trivial fraction) of Microsoft’s relevancy, why not just stop using those clicks and reduce the negative coverage and perception of this?" Is Matt Cutts suggesting that Bing special-case an exclusion for Google results?