To take a perfectly rational conclusion and call it sexist is quite a deriding trick, isn’t it? You’d need to try really hard to disprove different interest of

To take a perfectly rational conclusion and call it sexist is quite a deriding trick, isn’t it? You’d need to try really hard to disprove different interest of men and women, as literature suggests differences from a very young age, even before those children have chances to meet their peers. You’re just giving alternative explanations, which given the left side of the chart are much, much less likely. The economic argument also doesn’t make sense. STEM jobs may be among the highest paying ones, but certainly are not THE highest (not to mention the amount of effort compared to different high pay jobs).