3 ms·
I'm not trying to be negative but this site literally does not do what it claims: "automatically and continuously track technical metrics". It doesn't. Papers
by etaioinshrdlu 7y ago
I'm not trying to be negative but this site literally does not do what it claims: "automatically and continuously track technical metrics". It doesn't.
Papers with code, does however: https://paperswithcode.com/sota/image-classification-on-imagenet https://paperswithcode.com/sota/image-classification-on-imag...
Papers with code literally tracks the progress on common ML tasks programmatically. Please correct me if there's something I missed!
- AdrienLemaire 7y agoI didn't know about paperswithcode.com, and it looks amazing. Thanks a lot for sharing it!
- drongoking 7y agoI think you are correct: this site doesn't really do what it claims. I'm not sure how it's different from just searching arXiv. I am pleased to see paperswithcode.com as a collection point of research. But the fact that it casts all of AI as one big set of contests on datasets where "progress" is equated with small increments of classification accuracy is, well, a disappointing view of the field.