4 ms·
> I expect self driving cars to have an emergency brake An emergency brake isn't the end of all sadly. > laws require you to be present and focused to drive
by dwild 7y ago
> I expect self driving cars to have an emergency brake
An emergency brake isn't the end of all sadly.
> laws require you to be present and focused to drive on the road
Sure, I'm not arguing the current state of self driving car (which I wouldn't really call self driving car, but more like fancy cruise control, on the Volt they called it adaptive cruise control, which make more sense). I'm arguing about the future without a wheel to drive. It's not happening right now, that's for sure, but Google is working on it and there's no
> You still get a dui on a horse even if you are passed out on top and the horse is walking itself home.
You still can act on a horse though, what made you unable to control it is your consumption (which is your responsibility not to). In a self driving car without a wheel, you no longer have any control, even if you wanted to. It may have an emergency brake, but that's can only do so much. In a world where going on a horse would cause you to be inebriated, you wouldn't get a DUI for riding one ;).
> We also don't need to use cars even in cities with poor transit. Most people's car trips are biking distances. Everyone can also own a moped and enjoy 100mpg, easy parking, and experience less congestion than what the 20 foot car introduces to a city.
Where do you live? Have you lived outside of there? In most cities you still need a car. Sorry for the accusation but theses sentences made it seems like you never lived outside of there. I'm close to Montreal in Quebec, even my car yesterday had trouble in some streets, believe me, even though we are lucky to have some amazing bike lane here, biking distance get thrown out of the window for the next 4 months. Walking is much slower right now, a moped would be actually illegal. I traded 2 hours of transit a day to 30 minutes by buying a car. I know so many people that currently do more than 2 hours a day, and that's in a city with a relatively good public transit in a pretty dense area.
Inside most cities, you still need a car. Without cars, you couldn't support the current society. You are free to disagree that our current way of living is alright, but sadly, we can't change that easily and it will certainly not happen before self driving car become the norm.
- asdff 7y agoThat's a good point about the horse. I suppose you'd be fine. I'd love to just crawl into a car and have it zip me home if I end up sick after a bar! I live in LA but grew up on the east coast. I'm not sure about Canada, but 50 percent of trips in the U.S. are 4 miles or less (1). 4 miles at a comfortable biking pace translates to 20 minutes, which is pretty doable on a bike (not to mention good cardio). On a bike you don't really experience traffic either, in fact it's almost better to bike when cars aren't moving during rush hour. Even if people just biked while the weather was nice, it would make a huge difference for congestion and the environment, and would drive public support for better bike infrastructure to make it even easier. It's damn cheap to paint a bike lane, compared to other transit plans after all. 1. https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/policyinformation/pubs/pl08021/fig4_5.cfm https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/policyinformation/pubs/pl08021/fig4...