3 ms·
If you interpreted my comment that way I apologize, but that's not what I said. I said the owner could pay for the service OR the police could get a warrant. In
by freehunter 7y ago
If you interpreted my comment that way I apologize, but that's not what I said. I said the owner could pay for the service OR the police could get a warrant. In no way was I attempting to suggest the police need a warrant AND still have to pay.
- beerandt 7y agoApologies, I see that now. I read it as speaking on a right to be paid for services rendered, which I don't disagree with. Although I'm still curious as to any case law.