5 ms·

It's a Facebook approved app through and everything stays within Facebook's ecosystem. Check it out: https://blog.repixel.co/2019/07/01/facebook-and-gdpr-compli

It's a Facebook approved app through and everything stays within Facebook's ecosystem. Check it out: https://blog.repixel.co/2019/07/01/facebook-and-gdpr-compliance/ https://blog.repixel.co/2019/07/01/facebook-and-gdpr-complia...

giggles_giggles 7y ago
To someone like me who has not used Facebook in over half a decade and finds the organization creepy, this is most certainly the opposite of a selling point.
- slynn12 7y ago
  As long as I'm seeing ads, I'd rather them be relevant. Just my $0.02. But if you're avoiding the platform altogether I get that.
  - paulgb 7y ago
    Sorry if this comes off as rude, but do you have a financial relationship with repixel?
  - JohnFen 7y ago
    > As long as I'm seeing ads, I'd rather them be relevant. Fair enough. My preference is different. I don't care about seeing ads, and I couldn't care less if they're "relevant" or not. But I strongly object to the data collection required to target ads and want it to stop.
  - anoncake 7y ago
    That sounds backwards. If my ad blocker fails and I'm forced to see an ad, I want it to be as irrelevant as possible to minimize its effect.
geofft 7y ago
Safari's tracking policy is in large part intended to protect users against the Facebook ecosystem (even though, yes, it is not specific to Facebook or any other domain and just establishes policies for technical behavior): https://www.theverge.com/2018/6/4/17427000/wwdc-apple-safari-antitracking-facebook-like-share https://www.theverge.com/2018/6/4/17427000/wwdc-apple-safari... > Cross-site tracking is tracking across multiple first party websites; tracking between websites and apps; or the retention, use, or sharing of data from that activity with parties other than the first party on which it was collected. I think that having Facebook share tracking information with Repixel and in turn with Repixel's customers counts as "sharing of data from that activity with parties other than the first party on which it was collected," no?
- slynn12 7y ago
  Where are you seeing that sentence that you quoted? I'm curious to take a look. I don't see it in the verge article that you linked to. Apologies if I'm missing something.
  - geofft 7y ago
    Sorry, that was unclear. That sentence is from the WebKit/Safari policy which I linked earlier in the thread. (The Verge article is a synthesis of the stated policy and the fact that the WWDC presentation clearly had a screenshot of blocking Facebook cookies.)
    - slynn12 7y ago
      All good, thanks for clarifying! I'll take a look tonight.
anoncake 7y ago
So what?

giggles_giggles 7y ago

To someone like me who has not used Facebook in over half a decade and finds the organization creepy, this is most certainly the opposite of a selling point.

slynn12 7y ago
As long as I'm seeing ads, I'd rather them be relevant. Just my $0.02. But if you're avoiding the platform altogether I get that.
- paulgb 7y ago
  Sorry if this comes off as rude, but do you have a financial relationship with repixel?
- JohnFen 7y ago
  > As long as I'm seeing ads, I'd rather them be relevant. Fair enough. My preference is different. I don't care about seeing ads, and I couldn't care less if they're "relevant" or not. But I strongly object to the data collection required to target ads and want it to stop.
- anoncake 7y ago
  That sounds backwards. If my ad blocker fails and I'm forced to see an ad, I want it to be as irrelevant as possible to minimize its effect.

geofft 7y ago

Safari's tracking policy is in large part intended to protect users against the Facebook ecosystem (even though, yes, it is not specific to Facebook or any other domain and just establishes policies for technical behavior): https://www.theverge.com/2018/6/4/17427000/wwdc-apple-safari-antitracking-facebook-like-share https://www.theverge.com/2018/6/4/17427000/wwdc-apple-safari... > Cross-site tracking is tracking across multiple first party websites; tracking between websites and apps; or the retention, use, or sharing of data from that activity with parties other than the first party on which it was collected. I think that having Facebook share tracking information with Repixel and in turn with Repixel's customers counts as "sharing of data from that activity with parties other than the first party on which it was collected," no?

slynn12 7y ago
Where are you seeing that sentence that you quoted? I'm curious to take a look. I don't see it in the verge article that you linked to. Apologies if I'm missing something.
- geofft 7y ago
  Sorry, that was unclear. That sentence is from the WebKit/Safari policy which I linked earlier in the thread. (The Verge article is a synthesis of the stated policy and the fact that the WWDC presentation clearly had a screenshot of blocking Facebook cookies.)
  - slynn12 7y ago
    All good, thanks for clarifying! I'll take a look tonight.

anoncake 7y ago

So what?