3 ms·
Right, but as a matter of business policy. I'm speaking as a matter of legal precedent. (Which may be applicable in this case, just not explicitly stated.) Top
by beerandt 7y ago
Right, but as a matter of business policy. I'm speaking as a matter of legal precedent. (Which may be applicable in this case, just not explicitly stated.)
Top level comment suggested a right to charge for costs incurred, irrespective of having a warrant.
- freehunter 7y agoIf you interpreted my comment that way I apologize, but that's not what I said. I said the owner could pay for the service OR the police could get a warrant. In no way was I attempting to suggest the police need a warrant AND still have to pay.
- beerandt 7y agoApologies, I see that now. I read it as speaking on a right to be paid for services rendered, which I don't disagree with. Although I'm still curious as to any case law.