> subsidize internet access in the developing world Are you talking about Facebook's abuse of power to strengthen its monopoly position in developing nations?

> subsidize internet access in the developing world Are you talking about Facebook's abuse of power to strengthen its monopoly position in developing nations? If so, 83% of voters in the USA thinks what you are describing as "subsidy" should be illegal here[1], and it would better be described as neo-colonialism than a subsidy. Is there some other way in which facebook is "subsidizing internet access"? [1] https://thehill.com/policy/technology/364528-poll-83-percent-of-voters-support-keeping-fccs-net-neutrality-rules https://thehill.com/policy/technology/364528-poll-83-percent...