3 ms·
The argument is that you use those products and give them that information voluntarily, however under-handed the tactics are to get you to volunteer that info.
by auiya 7y ago
The argument is that you use those products and give them that information voluntarily, however under-handed the tactics are to get you to volunteer that info. Law enforcement surveillance isn't voluntary.
- thatcat 7y agoIf police use the lack of information from those avenues as a justification for a warrant to conduct surveillance then that argument is moot.
- auiya 7y agoAre you privy to any warrants actually being issued solely because the police couldn't turn up info on a suspect via Facebook or Google? Maybe I'm ignorant, but I don't think that's a thing that actually happens.
- thatcat 7y agoAlthough reputation and behavior has a role in the decision other factors would need to be in play. I meant more that no social media could be seen as anti social by a judge and added to the list of things that ultimately satisfies probable cause.