3 ms·
The title of this post is inaccurate. The article is discussing how someone (who is not an engineer) provided "engineering-quality work" which could mislead the
by hvs 16y ago
The title of this post is inaccurate. The article is discussing how someone (who is not an engineer) provided "engineering-quality work" which could mislead the DOT and the public that it was done by an engineer.
If anything, this article is highlighting how licensing is more often used to protect a select few rather than showing the "dangers of unlicensed engineering."
- pyre 16y agoConsidering the forum, I think that the title is sarcasm.
- bmccormack 16y agoThat's certainly possible, but I personally find sarcasm very difficult to detect on the web. I generally avoid it when communicating online and via text.
- te_platt 16y agoFunny how good your comment is if you are being sarcastic. But now I can't tell if it is sarcasm or not.