5 ms·
I’m a developer who daily drives a stacked 2009 Mac Pro. Friends sassed me for spending 3.5k on it in 09, “why would you ever need 32GB of ram?” Well today it d
by liquidise 7y ago
I’m a developer who daily drives a stacked 2009 Mac Pro. Friends sassed me for spending 3.5k on it in 09, “why would you ever need 32GB of ram?” Well today it does everything I want from it except install new Mac OS’s. Ironically, this machine can handle modern tech stacks but can’t install anything past Sierra, which means it can’t do modern iOS development.
I highly anticipated the new Mac Pro and was generally excited with the result. It is, in my opinion, a realignment and a positive move from Apple. But, as the article points out, it is a piss poor value until you considerably upgrade from the base specs. Worse still the Xeon options are a disaster compared to newly minted threadripper parts dollar for dollar.
The Pro and the 16” have me feeling more positive about Apple than I have in years. It’s also too little too late. I’m part way into a hackintosh build that I hope to ride for a couple of generations to watch Apples decisions from a safe distance. I want them to win me back, but I remain nervous that developers represent a market segment Apple either doesn’t understand or isn’t interested in pleasing.
- bewilderbeast 7y agoDo you know about dosdude's Catalina patcher? And for previous versions? It's unofficial, so it might not suit you at all. It allows older hardware to run (with some caveats) newer macOS versions. http://dosdude1.com/catalina/ http://dosdude1.com/catalina/ Currently I have a 2009 MacBook Pro 5.1 running High Sierra.
- enev 7y agoJust an FYI, at least on previous patchers it turns off SIP. I’ve turned it back on and haven’t had an issue, but it does display a warning on boot that things may not work.
- jammygit 7y agoWhat prevents the update, just a software flag, or will the system not run the newer OS properly (32 bit vs 64 etc)?