3 ms·
David Gerard presents himself differently in his book than how he acts in real life. In the words of Brendan Eich, David is a "real piece of work". For the rec
by Acrobatic_Road 7y ago
David Gerard presents himself differently in his book than how he acts in real life. In the words of Brendan Eich, David is a "real piece of work".
For the record, we are taking about the guy who created the Bitcoin article on RationalWiki back in 2011.
PROOF: https://rationalwiki.org/w/index.php?title=Bitcoin&oldid=819359 https://rationalwiki.org/w/index.php?title=Bitcoin&oldid=819...
He's also an admin on Wikipedia and claims to be a "subject matter expert" on cryptocurrency which he uses to get around his obvious conflict of interest.
Here's what he had to say about Ethereum:
>I believe Ethereum's codebase is based on the Bitcoin codebase (though I don't have a cite), so it's a fork of that (as most altcoins are). Hypothetically you could do blockchain software that wasn't, but that's not relevant here. The actual blockchain generated from this is separate - David Gerard (talk) 12:10, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
Yeah, a real subject matter expert who can't be bothered to do two minutes of research.
Stay away from this clown.
- DonHopkins 7y agoSince you mention it, and you see fit to call people names like "clown", I'll point out that Brendan Eich is a "real piece of work" too, you know. He's never rationally explained what motivated him to donate his money to destroy other people's marriages. At least "clowns" don't treat other people as less than human, and spend their own money to destroy and prevent other people's loving marriages, and pay for TV ads lying about and demonizing them.