>as the robot's appearance continues to become less distinguishable from a human being, the emotional response becomes positive once again and approaches human-

>as the robot's appearance continues to become less distinguishable from a human being, the emotional response becomes positive once again and approaches human-to-human empathy levels The gap implied by "approaches" is where the problems occur, and how that gap is dealt with is where inherent bias in the process(es) fits. >Computer vision can process images with a higher resolution than the human eye can distinguish. The problem is not in the resolution, but the "process" part. Also, "resolution" is not the right word to pivot the situation on, since we'd have to be comparing a digital system with an analog one. >All models are wrong, but some are useful. Useful I'll give you, but for life and death decisions? It's not going to help me evade downvotes, but...not so much.