The very fact that this person was willing to commit a crime makes your argument irrelevant. No one has stated this person should get a death penalty for vanda

The very fact that this person was willing to commit a crime makes your argument irrelevant. No one has stated this person should get a death penalty for vandalism. No one. And poo on you for trying to argue such. I suppose we should wait until this individual attempts to kill atleast 4 people before they qualify for the death penalty? 10? 2? 100? How many does it take before they're considered violent and dangerous?