5 ms·
Here are the rules: http://ribbonfarm.com/the-gervais-principle http://ribbonfarm.com/the-gervais-principle And they make for uncomfortable reading.
by scrumper 7y ago
Here are the rules: http://ribbonfarm.com/the-gervais-principle http://ribbonfarm.com/the-gervais-principle
And they make for uncomfortable reading.
- deleted 7y ago[deleted]
- tra3 7y agoI'd be remiss if I didn't mention "Developer Hegemony" [0], a book about dealing with this sorts of garbage. Even thought it's forward looking there's a lot of practical advice. Here's a review [1] that does it justice: > It’s not a book about software development, it is a book about the industry of software development and why it is fundamentally different than “traditional” industries. And it is a book that promises an outlook on “the future of labor”, at least for us developers... It’s about finding your way in an industry that is in very high demand and mostly consists of players that play by the rules of an entirely different game: industrial manufacturing. [0] https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/35051753-developer-hegemony https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/35051753-developer-hegem... [1] https://schneide.blog/2019/10/14/book-review-developer-hegemony/ https://schneide.blog/2019/10/14/book-review-developer-hegem...
- fg6hr 7y agoThat's an interesting read. However what it describes looks like a very shallow version of lam-rim chen-mo, volumes 4-5, that explain the concept of emptiness and the danger of falling into nihilism. Edit: the tricks like "powertalk" and "information poker" are interesting, but rephrasing the book, manipulating people is not a game worth getting good at.
- scrumper 7y agoI found that the article (I haven't read the book) makes a reasonable defense of "loserdom" - it's not a bad life if you seek meaning external to work and it certainly offers a more fulfilling existence than that of the deluded clueless.