3 ms·

So what, maybe I just want to punish Boeing for their behavior?

• arcticbull 7y ago
  Right but plane is not the only thing that matters. For instance Allegiant has no 737s (only Airbus equipment) but one of America’s worst safety records. Take care you’re not cutting off your nose to spite your face. Policy, training, hub locations, safety culture all matter too. Your approach also fails to take into account the non-uniform distribution of accidents at take off and landing vs at cruise, so if you take a 3 stop itinerary on an Airbus-only airline with a worse safety track record, you may be at more risk than a nonstop on an even unpatched MAX. [1] https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.mcall.com/business/transportation/mc-biz-allegiant-safety-record-lvia-20190831-nvab3epnergm3buqoimaankjsa-story.html%3foutputType=amp https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.mcall.com/business/transpor...
  • t-writescode 7y ago
    When punishing an unrepentant company, you don’t look at statistics.
    • arcticbull 7y ago
      Yes, although my question remains: is it worth putting yourself at more risk than flying a MAX just to protest the risk of flying the MAX? I understand these things are irrational, however humans are notoriously bad at managing the incredibly low risk of something very bad happening. There's practically no chance of anything happening to you one way or the other and I think it's easy to forget that.