4 ms·
For which cancers does this procedure work (assuming your wife didn't have prostate cancer)? I understand 25 k USD feels reasonable if it saves your life witho
by dorfsmay 7y ago
For which cancers does this procedure work (assuming your wife didn't have prostate cancer)?
I understand 25 k USD feels reasonable if it saves your life without surgery and it's complications, but it steep for "just ultrasound". Do you know why it was that expensive?
- killjoywashere 7y agoMRI is probably the major technical cost. It's fairly high touch and the magnets wear out, so the capital cost of each test is fairly real. That and the professional component. Interventional radiologists are very much in the consultant/handyman/engineer business of "Treatment: $1; knowing where to put it: $9999"
- comfrey11 7y agoIn Japan an you can get an MRI for $160 US I hear
- killjoywashere 7y agoDo you get the radiologist's read for $160? Do they put an ablative ultrasound probe in you and hold it for an hour for $160?
- comfrey11 7y agoHonestly I’m not sure with the 160 covers. It’s just another one of those things in our medical system that is priced a bit too high to make sense for a good number of folks. I would like to see healthcare be more accessible.
- Johnny555 7y agoWhat's the purpose of an ablative ultrasound probe in an MRI? An MRI uses high intensity magnetic fields, not ultrasound.
- dogma1138 7y agoMedical treatment in Japan is mostly paid for by the government with the individual co-pay being 30-0% depending on the procedure. The cost to the patient =! the actual cost of the procedure. I would pay £0 for spending the night in the hospital even tho the cost of the trauma bed alone is £3200 per night according to NHS England.
- tasogare 7y agoIt’s not paid by the government, it’s paid by the health insurance system that everyone must enroll in and had to pay for every trimester. Granted, it’s not too expensive.
- k_sze 7y ago> (assuming your wife didn’t have prostate cancer) I almost spewed my coffee. At McDonald’s. Thanks for making me get weird looks from other people. XD
- seandougall 7y agoJust a friendly reminder that many trans women and some intersex women do indeed have prostates. So although it’s a safe bet statistically that the commenter was not referring to prostate cancer, it’s not a particularly absurd hypothetical.
- k_sze 7y agoSome trans women have prostates? TIL. I honestly didn't know. But you're right that I completely forgot about the intersex group. In fact, I initially wondered if homosexual couples (of either sex) could refer to their SO as "wife", but then the comments also use "she", so I kinda dismissed the possibility of a biologically male "wife".
- remotecool 7y agoYes, some trans women have prostates. In 2019, even if you have a penis and balls, you can identify as a woman for the day and be considered 'trans'. I'm glad people are starting to respect pronouns, so I can be called by my proper pronoun: "gigantic cock".
- dang 7y agoIf you keep posting flamebait to HN we're going to have to ban you, so please stop. https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html
- remotecool 7y agoIt's not flaimbait. I'm posting the truth. I'm sorry if the truth hurts and you are offended by my personal pronouns.