3 ms·
I think the issue is lack of user interest. I’ve tried using FUSE for the Mac many times throughout the years, mostly for curl_fs and ssh_fs. Believe it or no
by tambourine_man 7y ago
I think the issue is lack of user interest.
I’ve tried using FUSE for the Mac many times throughout the years, mostly for curl_fs and ssh_fs.
Believe it or not, I’m not happy with the FTP alternatives on the Mac. Transmit is beautiful but buggy and lacks features such as general purpose SOCKS proxy. FileZilla is ugly as sin. Cyberduck is neither pretty nor feature packed.
Although it got better recently, FUSE for the Mac has always been incredibly slow and buggy, no matter how many command line flags I added.
So between native NTFS read, ExFat read/write and decent for most people remote disk apps, there are probably very few users who care about FUSE on the Mac.
- cerberusss 7y agoThere's also Expandrive.
- tambourine_man 7y agoI briefly tried. Does it work well? Also tried Transmit's mount feature, but wasn't very satisfied.
- cerberusss 7y agoI tried it many years ago. They changed so much in the meantime. But back then, the product was pretty good.