3 ms·

are you sure? it's not using oxfuse on the google drive clients that the users download and install on their own machines?

• jagged-chisel 7y ago
  Distributing it inside the client does indeed qualify as 'distribution' under the GPL and would require the client to then be licensed under the GPL.
  • tobias3 7y ago
    As far as I understand this would be a "mere aggregation" since the application and the kernel module communicate at arms length through the kernel syscall interface https://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.en.html#MereAggregation https://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.en.html#MereAggregation . So they'd have to make the source of the kernel extension available (as the GPL requires) but it would not be viral to the application using the kernel extension. As the FAQ entry says this is a legal question "which ultimately judges will decide" and as far as I know that hasn't happend yet. Which is probably one reason many don't want to do it and err on the safe side and choose another project with non-viral license.
    • jagged-chisel 7y ago
      I agree. I was thinking along the lines of linking the code into the app, rather than an included kernel module.