9 ms·
> Forces you to make smaller and more specific commits There's no forcing anyone to make smaller and specific commits. It may be used as a reminder, or tool, b
by kfrzcode 7y ago
> Forces you to make smaller and more specific commits
There's no forcing anyone to make smaller and specific commits. It may be used as a reminder, or tool, but certainly not going to prevent someone from committing junk behind whatever emoji they choose.
- gitgud 7y ago> Forces you to make smaller and more specific commits This seemed like a negative point to me, I envisioned "smaller" commit messages purely of emoji's ..... :(
- amarshall 7y agoNot to mention that a non-emoji based tagging scheme (e.g. “[bug]”, “[UI]”, etc.) would likely have the same effect (if there is any) that the author purports.
- larusso 7y agoPlus the benefit of not being ambiguous like a lipstick emoji :)
- savolai 7y agoThe implications of comparing UX work with lipstick, in terms of the author's attitude.. don't get me started.
- josteink 7y agoI'd actually interpret that as "lipstick on a pig", or just "[hack]". I'm honestly not sure what its intentions are. Which I guess is one of the problems with this suggestion.
- larusso 7y agoDepending on the screen I always see a Rotating police light in red at first.
- Lex-2008 7y agoam I the only one who first (before reading the description) saw the lipstick emoji as an emergency vehicle beacon lighting?
- larusso 7y agoNo. I also do all the time.