Eh? The selection of the 5 from the 300 is randomly selected for each time each person goes to jury duty. (If it is in a category that few people select, perha

Eh? The selection of the 5 from the 300 is randomly selected for each time each person goes to jury duty. (If it is in a category that few people select, perhaps prioritize options that hasn't been shown to people as often) So, I don't see the issue with the "narrowing down the list of 300 watchmakers down to 5". This ensures that some people become aware of the different new products. If they find any of the products that they see to be remarkable, they might purchase it, and quality can spread by word of mouth. Also, there could still be people who do reviews of products, they just legally couldn't receive any compensation from the people selling the products.